Independent Thoughts [alnaim.com]

Follow the path of the unsafe, independent thinker. Expose your ideas to the danger of controversy. Speak your mind and fear less the label of "crackpot" than the stigma of conformity. -- Thomas J. Watson, Sr.

Wednesday, November 01, 2006

ExxonMobil just reported its quarterly earnings and guess how much they made--$10 billion (yes, with a “B”). Why are they making so much money? Are they being more productive? Not really. They’re making more money thanks to the unethical (and should be illegal) behavior of OPEC. Now I’m sure many of your will think I’m an asshole for saying that, but it’s true. Saudi Arabia and OPEC are engaging in an activity that is illegal in most countries in the world; they are manipulating the market by using their dominance. Cartels are illegal almost everywhere in the world for a really good reason; they harm the consumer and produce above-fair profits for producers. Let me explain more. Let us say that the current price of a gallon of milk is $2. This is the price that is prevailing in the market as a result of healthy competition between many, many producers. Producers know they can’t charge more than that price for their product because they know you would go and buy your milk from their competition. Why is that possible? Because if I were a milk company and my competitor raised their prices, I most likely won’t because I know that my competitor’s customers would come to me now that my price is lower. The result? Competitors charge a low price for their product and consumers win. Now, let us say that all milk producers get together and decide to simultaneously raise the price to $3. Consumers would have no choice but to buy milk at the new price because there are no alternative sources of milk, all producers raised their price at the same time. In fact, they could probably get away with $5 milk because most people drink milk because they need it. Why don’t milk producers get together and do that? Because laws make such a behavior (forming cartels) illegal! The law protects consumers from greedy producers and ensures that consumers pay a free market price, a fair price. Islam also prohibits such behavior because the producers are taking advantage of their market power and make more and more money, more than a free market price would generate. That is exactly what OPEC is doing! Billions of consumers around the world are paying more money for essentials (oil affects the price of everything because of its effect on transportation—e.g. shipping—costs). True, speculation is affecting oil prices, but if OPEC didn’t exist, the price of oil would be much lower, even with the speculation because the supply of oil would be bigger. Unfair profits are flowing into the bank accounts of oil companies like ExxonMobil and countries such as Saudi Arabia. Just because we’re Saudi doesn’t mean we have to defend OPEC’s unfair, unethical, and haram behavior. It is unfair to every consumer in the world because we are using our market dominance to make more profits than we would if we couldn’t control the supply through OPEC. I think that international law should ban cartels just as the local laws of most countries do, and I think that what we are doing (as a country and as citizens supporting what our country is doing) is very shameful, especially since we’re Muslims.

5 Comments:

  • At 9:08 PM , Hamad Mohawis said...

    very nice post, aziz.

     
  • At 11:11 PM , Anonymous said...

    Finally, someone speaks out.

     
  • At 9:07 PM , tariq said...

    I know it's in your blood to pass out Fatwas but let's not condemn OPEC and whoever works for it, directly or indirectly, yet. The way I see it, we have no choice but to join OPEC and manage our national resources to meet our interests. There are areas where Islam has allowed reevaluation if it is for the greater good of it's people. (Ex. Throwing the stones in Hajj is now allowed before zawal to prevent stampedes).

    Honestly, I see it as our obligation as the worlds' energy provider to always maintain excess capacity to absorb shocks in the oil market. You know that things would be much worse now hadn't we been holding back production. What would have happened? Prices would have went way down to a level where exploration and capacity increase are just not economic. No excess capacity adding to the sudden increase in demand in the East and problems in many producing countries... you think they're fighting for oil now?

    I know it's not easy to discuss in a few sentences, but dude... in my opinion, we're doing the world a favor!!! And if this the only thing we have to be ashamed of, then I'm happy!!!

    (ARAMCO: Energy to the world!!!) :)

     
  • At 11:18 AM , Abdulaziz Alnaim said...

    My name is Abdulaziz Alnaim and I am a Qasimi, so fatwas are in my blood.

    OPEC wouldn't have as big an impact on price as it does today if Saudi Arabia didn't join it. If we want to maintain excess capacity for purely altruistic reasons we could do so without OPEC. I don't believe that prices would have plummeted because as you said, supplies are short to start with, they would just have been a bit lower. I mean it's hard to argue that ExxonMobil, for example, would stop exploring for oil if it's return on shareholders' equity (the money invested in the business) declined to a "mere" 15% (much higher than the average US company) instead of the 35% it's now generating.
    OPEC is interfering with the market, and if we learned something in the past 100 years it's that market intervention doesn't benefit anyone, even producers get hurt in the long run. There's nothing better than free markets in product prices to reach economic efficiancy. Regarding Islam's view, the whole idea behind Islam prohibits any form of market manipulation IS to protect the greater good. How is taking the money from millions or billions of humans and putting it in the hands of a few (in power) a good thing? One might argue that the money we're taking is from non-Muslims or whatever, but since when was it ok to be unfair to others if they're non-Muslims? The basic truth is this: regardless of why we're doing it, Saudi Arabia is using its market power to generate more money than it would in a free market. If it wanted to "just" stablize markets it could do so by maintaing production so that the price of oil doesn't go below say $30, but it just pushed for a production cut through OPEC to maintain the price of oil in the $60 range, that is way higher than what is necessary for stability and/or provide an incentive for exploration, two arguments commonly brought up by OPEC.

     
  • At 6:18 AM , Anonymous said...

    Last time I checked, your dad was VP of Exploration at Saudi Aramco right? Have you had a discussion with him to get his point of view?

     

Post a Comment

<< Home